| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs i5-1135G7


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 262.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
806c1
Core
Ice Lake-U
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
69.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
262.07k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
3.77k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
17.26k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
9.24k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
8.39k (x0.98)
TOTAL
37.15k
38.66k (x1.04)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
16.86k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
76.62k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
34.56k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
4.5k (x0.89)
TOTAL
102.13k
132.53k (x1.3)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
13.43k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
22.29k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
11.18k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
9.75k (x1.02)
TOTAL
50.91k
56.64k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
40.24k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
65.99k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
28.51k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
6.66k (x1.21)
TOTAL
141.91k
141.4k (x1)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
15.2k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
19.53k
23.46k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.37k
11.05k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.23k
9.53k (x1.03)
TOTAL
51.7k
59.23k (x1.15)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
56.25k
43.69k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
73.73k
70.25k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.56k
28.48k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.39k
6.24k (x1.16)
TOTAL
164.94k
148.66k (x0.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
26.46k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
23.63k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
10.24k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
9.05k (x1.1)
TOTAL
55.37k
69.38k (x1.25)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
105.02k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
108.51k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
36.5k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
12.04k (x2.17)
TOTAL
171.65k
262.07k (x1.53)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
3751 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
1304 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
430 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
9359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
6299 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5626 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
2439 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
2154 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
16518 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4