| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G1 vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G1 gets a score of 171.6 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
806c1
Core
Ice Lake-U
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
55.37k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.65k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
3.75k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
14.98k
17.22k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
9.79k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.6k
8.21k (x0.95)
TOTAL
37.15k
38.97k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.61k
9.19k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
54.9k
35.47k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.58k
19.14k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
5.82k (x1.15)
TOTAL
102.13k
69.62k (x0.68)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.89k
12.9k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
18.55k
21.4k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
10.73k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.54k
8.16k (x0.86)
TOTAL
50.91k
53.19k (x1.04)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
50.06k
30.31k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
66.1k
45.13k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.24k
20.17k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
5.77k (x1.05)
TOTAL
141.91k
101.38k (x0.71)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.58k
14.65k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
19.53k
21.57k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.37k
9.93k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.23k
8.02k (x0.87)
TOTAL
51.7k
54.18k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
56.25k
32.14k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
73.73k
43.54k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.56k
19.58k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.39k
5.61k (x1.04)
TOTAL
164.94k
100.87k (x0.61)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G1
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.5k
24.25k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
17.71k
21.63k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.92k
9.09k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
7.23k (x0.88)
TOTAL
55.37k
62.19k (x1.12)

Multithread

i5-1035G1

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
73.03k
56.9k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
68.19k
55.68k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.89k
19.29k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
6.09k (x1.1)
TOTAL
171.65k
137.96k (x0.8)

Performance/W
i5-1035G1
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4869 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4546 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1660 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
369 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
11443 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G1
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5972 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4919 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2201 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2290 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
15381 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4