| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i7-9750H


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-H
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
276.46k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
16.31k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
24.48k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
5.87k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
13.02k (x1.14)
TOTAL
55.87k
59.67k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
87.54k (x3.27)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
131.05k (x2.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
28.47k (x2.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
11.8k (x0.99)
TOTAL
92.66k
258.87k (x2.79)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
25.22k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
21.97k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
5.02k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
10.71k (x0.9)
TOTAL
69.47k
62.92k (x0.91)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
125.56k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
115.86k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
25.63k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
9.4k (x1.17)
TOTAL
246.07k
276.46k (x1.12)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
6144 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4