Core i5-10300H vs i7-8650U
Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.4 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.4 times faster than the i7-8650U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
806ea
Core
Comet Lake-H
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
173.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
21.61k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
19.69k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
4.61k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
9.95k (x0.84)
TOTAL
69.47k
55.86k (x0.8)
Multithread
i5-10300H
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
78.38k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
72.02k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
16.95k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
6.15k (x0.77)
TOTAL
246.07k
173.49k (x0.71)
Performance/W
i5-10300H
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
4802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
1130 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
410 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
11566 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
5146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
4689 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1097 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
2368 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
13300 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4