| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i7-4770


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4770 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i7-4770 gets 184 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
45.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
184k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
13.62k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
12.55k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
5.17k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
4.67k (x0.41)
TOTAL
55.87k
36k (x0.64)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
56.17k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
59.54k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
23.91k (x2.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
8.21k (x0.69)
TOTAL
92.66k
147.82k (x1.6)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
23.02k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
11.89k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
5.29k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
4.98k (x0.42)
TOTAL
69.47k
45.19k (x0.65)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
94.23k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
59.02k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
25.06k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
5.69k (x0.71)
TOTAL
246.07k
184k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
1122 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
703 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
2191 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i7-4770
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
5902 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
1278 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
11586 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4