| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i7-10610U


Description
Both models i5-10300H and i7-10610U are based on Comet Lake architecture.

Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i7-10610U gets 162 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.5 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-H
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
FCBGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
56.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
162k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
23.1k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
20k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
4.61k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
8.94k (x0.75)
TOTAL
69.47k
56.65k (x0.82)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
73.36k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
68.28k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
13.73k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
6.62k (x0.83)
TOTAL
246.07k
162k (x0.66)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
2934 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
2731 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
549 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
6480 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i7-10610U
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
4715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
4082 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
940 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
1825 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
11562 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4