| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i7-10510U


Description
Both models i5-10300H and i7-10510U are based on Comet Lake architecture.

Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i7-10510U gets 190.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.3 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-H
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
59.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
190.82k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
17.52k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
26.74k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
6.22k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
13.33k (x1.17)
TOTAL
55.87k
63.81k (x1.14)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
54.53k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
85.61k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
20.87k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
8.05k (x0.68)
TOTAL
92.66k
169.07k (x1.82)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
22.85k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
21.15k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
4.78k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
10.24k (x0.86)
TOTAL
69.47k
59.01k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
86.08k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
79.78k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
18.26k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
6.69k (x0.83)
TOTAL
246.07k
190.82k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
5739 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
5319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
446 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
12721 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i7-10510U
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
4664 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
4316 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
975 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
2089 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
12044 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4