Core i5-10300H vs i5-8400
Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-8400 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i5-8400 gets 289.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8400 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i5-8400 gets 289.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8400 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2017
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
64.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
289.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
26.5k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
23.11k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
5.2k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
10.16k (x0.86)
TOTAL
69.47k
64.98k (x0.94)
Multithread
i5-10300H
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
135.08k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
121.49k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
27.53k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
5.5k (x0.69)
TOTAL
246.07k
289.61k (x1.18)
Performance/W
i5-10300H
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
2078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
1869 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
424 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
4455 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
6626 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5778 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1300 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
2541 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
16245 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4