| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i3-10105


Description
Both models i5-10300H and i3-10105 are based on Comet Lake architecture.

Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
253.93k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
16.11k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
24.12k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
5.71k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
7.89k (x0.69)
TOTAL
55.87k
53.83k (x0.96)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
58.25k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
105.73k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
27.8k (x2.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
3.51k (x0.29)
TOTAL
92.66k
195.29k (x2.11)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
28.9k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
25.85k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
5.88k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
8.29k (x0.7)
TOTAL
69.47k
68.92k (x0.99)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
111.69k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
110.23k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
28.45k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
3.56k (x0.44)
TOTAL
246.07k
253.93k (x1.03)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
3907 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4