| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs Ryzen 7 4800HS


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.7 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-H
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
61.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
427.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
16.66k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
26.01k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
9.31k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
9.15k (x0.77)
TOTAL
69.47k
61.12k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-10300H

4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
144.48k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
192.46k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
83.17k (x3.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
7.51k (x0.94)
TOTAL
246.07k
427.61k (x1.74)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
12218 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4