| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
348.35k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
15.04k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
20.95k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
8.57k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
21.71k (x1.9)
TOTAL
55.87k
66.27k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-10300H

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
94.36k (x3.52)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
141.73k (x3.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
69.38k (x6.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
32.72k (x2.75)
TOTAL
92.66k
338.19k (x3.65)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
16.04k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
24.47k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
8.38k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
21.66k (x1.83)
TOTAL
69.47k
70.55k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-10300H

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
113.63k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
143.55k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
63.84k (x2.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
27.34k (x3.41)
TOTAL
246.07k
348.35k (x1.42)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4