Core i5-10300H vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
198.27k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
13.04k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
22.35k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
5.37k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
3.4k (x0.3)
TOTAL
55.87k
44.15k (x0.79)
Multithread
i5-10300H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
56.49k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
100.74k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
28.21k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
3.04k (x0.26)
TOTAL
92.66k
188.49k (x2.03)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
14.2k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
23.23k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
5.35k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
5.18k (x0.44)
TOTAL
69.47k
47.96k (x0.69)
Multithread
i5-10300H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
58.24k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
105.72k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
28.73k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
5.59k (x0.7)
TOTAL
246.07k
198.27k (x0.81)
Performance/W
i5-10300H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4