| | | | | | |

Core i5-10300H vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10300H gets a score of 246.1 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-H
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
69.47k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
246.07k points
210.4k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
15.65k
16.27k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
23.13k
25.74k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.66k
11.5k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.43k
10.82k (x0.95)
TOTAL
55.87k
64.32k (x1.15)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
26.77k
54k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
43.81k
88.76k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.17k
35.23k (x3.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.91k
12.14k (x1.02)
TOTAL
92.66k
190.12k (x2.05)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10300H
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
27.14k
22.97k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
24.75k
21.61k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.73k
8.99k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.84k
8.52k (x0.72)
TOTAL
69.47k
62.1k (x0.89)

Multithread

i5-10300H

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
105.77k
82.75k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
107.47k
86.58k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.82k
29.34k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.02k
11.72k (x1.46)
TOTAL
246.07k
210.4k (x0.86)

Performance/W
i5-10300H
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2350 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
552 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
178 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
5468 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10300H
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6031 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1274 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2632 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
15437 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4