Core i5-10210U vs Xeon E3-1220 v3
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-U
Haswell-WS
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
56.03k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
147.78k points
140.76k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.96k
19.17k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
20.8k
10.55k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
4.79k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.5k
4.65k (x0.62)
TOTAL
56.03k
39.16k (x0.7)
Multithread
i5-10210U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
66.43k
73.13k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
62.38k
42.06k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.52k
18.03k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
7.54k (x1.69)
TOTAL
147.78k
140.76k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4429 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4158 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
968 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
9852 points/W
1759 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5468 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4953 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1134 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1785 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
13340 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4