Core i5-10210U vs i9-10980XE
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 8.5 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 145.5 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 8.5 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
50657
Core
Comet Lake-U
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
18/36
TDP
15 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
25344 kB
Date
August 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
55.86k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
145.51k points
1241.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
29.53k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
22.59k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.73k
5.99k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.43k
10.22k (x1.38)
TOTAL
55.86k
68.33k (x1.22)
Multithread
i5-10210U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
65.84k
587.06k (x8.92)
Test#2 (FP)
60.77k
496.41k (x8.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.45k
134.66k (x9.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.44k
22.99k (x5.17)
TOTAL
145.51k
1241.12k (x8.53)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
4389 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4052 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
9701 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
5503 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4900 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1127 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1769 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
13299 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4