Core i5-10210U vs i9-10900X
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 4.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 4.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
50657
Core
Comet Lake-U
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/20
TDP
15 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
19712 kB
Date
August 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.03k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
147.78k points
632.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.96k
25.97k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
20.8k
22.37k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.3k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.5k
8.63k (x1.15)
TOTAL
56.03k
62.28k (x1.11)
Multithread
i5-10210U
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
66.43k
281.98k (x4.24)
Test#2 (FP)
62.38k
259.01k (x4.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.52k
64.87k (x4.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
26.5k (x5.96)
TOTAL
147.78k
632.35k (x4.28)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
4429 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4158 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
968 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
9852 points/W
3832 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5468 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4953 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1134 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1785 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
13340 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4