| | | | | | |

Core i5-10210U vs i7-9750H


Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the i7-9750H gets 286.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.9 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.03k points
65.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
147.78k points
286.43k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.96k
25.93k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
20.8k
22.84k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.11k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.5k
11.46k (x1.53)
TOTAL
56.03k
65.33k (x1.17)

Multithread

i5-10210U

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
66.43k
130.68k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
62.38k
119.91k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.52k
28.76k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
7.08k (x1.59)
TOTAL
147.78k
286.43k (x1.94)

Performance/W
i5-10210U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4429 points/W
2904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4158 points/W
2665 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
968 points/W
639 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
157 points/W
TOTAL
9852 points/W
6365 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5468 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4953 points/GHz
5075 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1134 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1785 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
13340 points/GHz
14519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4