Core i5-10210U vs i7-9700K
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 3.1 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 3.1 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
906ec
Core
Comet Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.03k points
73.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
147.78k points
460.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.96k
29.3k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
20.8k
25.61k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.86k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.5k
12.86k (x1.72)
TOTAL
56.03k
73.62k (x1.31)
Multithread
i5-10210U
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
66.43k
217.77k (x3.28)
Test#2 (FP)
62.38k
190.46k (x3.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.52k
40.48k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
11.31k (x2.54)
TOTAL
147.78k
460.02k (x3.11)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
4429 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4158 points/W
2005 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
968 points/W
426 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
119 points/W
TOTAL
9852 points/W
4842 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
5468 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4953 points/GHz
5226 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1134 points/GHz
1195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1785 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
13340 points/GHz
15025 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4