Core i5-10210U vs i7-7500U
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-7500U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the i7-7500U gets 86.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.7 times faster than the i7-7500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the i7-7500U gets 86.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1.7 times faster than the i7-7500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
806e9
Core
Comet Lake-U
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
56.03k points
48.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
147.78k points
86.94k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
i7-7500U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.96k
20.74k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
20.8k
18.41k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
3.98k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.5k
5.54k (x0.74)
TOTAL
56.03k
48.67k (x0.87)
Multithread
i5-10210U
i7-7500U
Test#1 (Integers)
66.43k
37.34k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
62.38k
35.79k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.52k
8.34k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
5.48k (x1.23)
TOTAL
147.78k
86.94k (x0.59)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
i7-7500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4429 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4158 points/W
2386 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
968 points/W
556 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
365 points/W
TOTAL
9852 points/W
5796 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
i7-7500U
Test#1 (Integers)
5468 points/GHz
5926 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4953 points/GHz
5260 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1134 points/GHz
1137 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1785 points/GHz
1584 points/GHz
TOTAL
13340 points/GHz
13907 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4