| | | | | | |

Core i5-10210U vs i7-4770K


Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4770K is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the i7-4770K gets 173.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4770K is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-U
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
56.03k points
43.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
147.78k points
173.93k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
i7-4770K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.96k
21.28k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
20.8k
12.25k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
4.78k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.5k
4.9k (x0.65)
TOTAL
56.03k
43.21k (x0.77)

Multithread

i5-10210U

i7-4770K
Test#1 (Integers)
66.43k
86.17k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
62.38k
56.81k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.52k
21.88k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
9.07k (x2.04)
TOTAL
147.78k
173.93k (x1.18)

Performance/W
i5-10210U
i7-4770K
Test#1 (Integers)
4429 points/W
1026 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4158 points/W
676 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
968 points/W
260 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
9852 points/W
2071 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
i7-4770K
Test#1 (Integers)
5468 points/GHz
5456 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4953 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1134 points/GHz
1226 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1785 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
TOTAL
13340 points/GHz
11079 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4