Core i5-10210U vs i5-8400
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-8400 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the i5-8400 gets 289.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8400 is 2 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the i5-8400 gets 289.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8400 is 2 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
9216 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2017
Mean monothread perf.
56.03k points
64.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
147.78k points
289.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
22.96k
26.5k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
20.8k
23.11k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.2k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.5k
10.16k (x1.36)
TOTAL
56.03k
64.98k (x1.16)
Multithread
i5-10210U
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
66.43k
135.08k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
62.38k
121.49k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.52k
27.53k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
5.5k (x1.24)
TOTAL
147.78k
289.61k (x1.96)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
4429 points/W
2078 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4158 points/W
1869 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
968 points/W
424 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
9852 points/W
4455 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
i5-8400
Test#1 (Integers)
5468 points/GHz
6626 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4953 points/GHz
5778 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1134 points/GHz
1300 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1785 points/GHz
2541 points/GHz
TOTAL
13340 points/GHz
16245 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4