Core i5-10210U vs i5-8300H
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.03k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
147.78k points
182.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.96k
23.6k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
20.8k
21.72k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
4.61k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.5k
6.8k (x0.91)
TOTAL
56.03k
56.72k (x1.01)
Multithread
i5-10210U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
66.43k
79.12k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
62.38k
81.27k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.52k
17.46k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
4.62k (x1.04)
TOTAL
147.78k
182.47k (x1.23)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4429 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4158 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
968 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
9852 points/W
4055 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5468 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4953 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1134 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1785 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
13340 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4