| | | | | | |

Core i5-10210U vs i5-10400F


Description
Both models i5-10210U and i5-10400F are based on Comet Lake architecture.

Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.5 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.03k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
147.78k points
369.97k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.96k
26.28k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
20.8k
23.38k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.52k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.5k
12.96k (x1.73)
TOTAL
56.03k
68.14k (x1.22)

Multithread

i5-10210U

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
66.43k
163.67k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
62.38k
159.74k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.52k
39k (x2.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
7.56k (x1.7)
TOTAL
147.78k
369.97k (x2.5)

Performance/W
i5-10210U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4429 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4158 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
968 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
9852 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5468 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4953 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1134 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1785 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
13340 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4