Core i5-10210U vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 2.2 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 2.2 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-U
Renoir
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.03k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
147.78k points
327.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
22.96k
15.5k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
20.8k
22.96k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
8.78k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.5k
8.5k (x1.13)
TOTAL
56.03k
55.74k (x0.99)
Multithread
i5-10210U
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
66.43k
110.78k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
62.38k
149.38k (x2.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.52k
60.88k (x4.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
6.68k (x1.5)
TOTAL
147.78k
327.72k (x2.22)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
4429 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4158 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
968 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
9852 points/W
21848 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
5468 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4953 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1134 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1785 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
13340 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4