Core i5-10210U vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 2.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 2.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-U
Renoir
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.03k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
147.78k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.96k
15.48k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
20.8k
22.82k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
8.63k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.5k
7.17k (x0.96)
TOTAL
56.03k
54.11k (x0.97)
Multithread
i5-10210U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
66.43k
117.98k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
62.38k
146.43k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.52k
65.54k (x4.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
4.77k (x1.07)
TOTAL
147.78k
334.72k (x2.27)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
4429 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4158 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
968 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
9852 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
5468 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4953 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1134 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1785 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
13340 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4