Core i5-10210U vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10210U gets a score of 147.8 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.03k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
147.78k points
198.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10210U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.96k
14.2k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
20.8k
23.23k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
5.35k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.5k
5.18k (x0.69)
TOTAL
56.03k
47.96k (x0.86)
Multithread
i5-10210U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
66.43k
58.24k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
62.38k
105.72k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.52k
28.73k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.45k
5.59k (x1.26)
TOTAL
147.78k
198.27k (x1.34)
Performance/W
i5-10210U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4429 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4158 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
968 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
9852 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10210U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5468 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4953 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1134 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1785 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
13340 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4