Core i5-10200H vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
50657
Core
Comet Lake-H
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
311.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
16.86k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
12.08k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
3.37k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
6.29k (x0.54)
TOTAL
67.53k
38.61k (x0.57)
Multithread
i5-10200H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
150.99k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
118.54k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
33.44k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
8.6k (x2.02)
TOTAL
260.38k
311.57k (x1.2)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
3666 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4