| | | | | | |

Core i5-10200H vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
406f1
Core
Comet Lake-H
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
237.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
12.16k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
11.82k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
3.02k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
2.4k (x0.21)
TOTAL
67.53k
29.39k (x0.44)

Multithread

i5-10200H

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
103.77k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
102.28k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
26.13k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
5.65k (x1.33)
TOTAL
260.38k
237.83k (x0.91)

Performance/W
i5-10200H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
2798 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4