| | | | | | |

Core i5-10200H vs i9-10900X


Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 2.4 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
50657
Core
Comet Lake-H
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/20
TDP
35 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
19712 kB
Date
September 2020
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
632.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
25.97k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
22.37k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
5.3k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
8.63k (x0.74)
TOTAL
67.53k
62.28k (x0.92)

Multithread

i5-10200H

i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
281.98k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
259.01k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
64.87k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
26.5k (x6.23)
TOTAL
260.38k
632.35k (x2.43)

Performance/W
i5-10200H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
3832 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4