Core i5-10200H vs i7-9750H
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-H
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
276.46k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
25.22k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
21.97k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
5.02k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
10.71k (x0.92)
TOTAL
67.53k
62.92k (x0.93)
Multithread
i5-10200H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
125.56k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
115.86k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
25.63k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
9.4k (x2.21)
TOTAL
260.38k
276.46k (x1.06)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
6144 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4