| | | | | | |

Core i5-10200H vs i5-4590


Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-4590 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i5-4590 gets 140 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.9 times faster than the i5-4590 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
40.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
139.99k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
20.88k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
11.12k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
4.75k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
4.19k (x0.36)
TOTAL
67.53k
40.93k (x0.61)

Multithread

i5-10200H

i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
75.76k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
40.42k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
16.97k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
6.84k (x1.61)
TOTAL
260.38k
139.99k (x0.54)

Performance/W
i5-10200H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
902 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
481 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
1667 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
5643 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
3006 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
1132 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
11063 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4