Core i5-10200H vs i5-10400
Description
Both models i5-10200H and i5-10400 are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i5-10400 gets 372.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i5-10400 gets 372.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a0655
Core
Comet Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
68.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
372.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
26.43k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
23.89k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
5.63k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
12.1k (x1.04)
TOTAL
67.53k
68.04k (x1.01)
Multithread
i5-10200H
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
163.14k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
161.5k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
39.94k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
7.6k (x1.79)
TOTAL
260.38k
372.19k (x1.43)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
2510 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
615 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
117 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
5726 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
6146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5555 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1309 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
2814 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
15824 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4