Core i5-10200H vs i5-1035G1
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-H
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
171.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
21.5k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
17.71k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
7.92k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
8.24k (x0.71)
TOTAL
67.53k
55.37k (x0.82)
Multithread
i5-10200H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
73.03k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
68.19k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
24.89k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
5.54k (x1.3)
TOTAL
260.38k
171.65k (x0.66)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
11443 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4