Core i5-10200H vs i3-9100
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i3-9100 gets 229.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-9100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
906eb
Core
Comet Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
66.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
229.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
28.03k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
24.5k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
5.73k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
8.48k (x0.73)
TOTAL
67.53k
66.74k (x0.99)
Multithread
i5-10200H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
107.5k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
95.11k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
22.02k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
4.57k (x1.08)
TOTAL
260.38k
229.2k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
1654 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
1463 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
70 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
3526 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
6675 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5833 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
2018 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
15891 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4