| | | | | | |

Core i5-10200H vs i3-10105


Description
Both models i5-10200H and i3-10105 are based on Comet Lake architecture.

Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
253.93k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
28.9k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
25.85k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
5.88k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
8.29k (x0.71)
TOTAL
67.53k
68.92k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-10200H

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
111.69k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
110.23k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
28.45k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
3.56k (x0.84)
TOTAL
260.38k
253.93k (x0.98)

Performance/W
i5-10200H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
3907 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4