| | | | | | |

Core i5-10200H vs i3-1005G1


Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 116.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 2.2 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
50.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
116.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
19.45k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
16.75k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
8.04k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
6.38k (x0.55)
TOTAL
67.53k
50.62k (x0.75)

Multithread

i5-10200H

i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
46.52k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
48.76k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
17.12k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
4.23k (x0.99)
TOTAL
260.38k
116.63k (x0.45)

Performance/W
i5-10200H
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
3102 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
3251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
1141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
7776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
5721 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
4926 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
2365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
1877 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
14889 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4