Core i5-10200H vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
348.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
16.04k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
24.47k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
8.38k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
21.66k (x1.86)
TOTAL
67.53k
70.55k (x1.04)
Multithread
i5-10200H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
113.63k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
143.55k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
63.84k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
27.34k (x6.43)
TOTAL
260.38k
348.35k (x1.34)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4