| | | | | | |

Core i5-10200H vs i7-12700H


Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 2.5 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906a3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
14/20
TDP
35 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
24576 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
93.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
643.29k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
41.64k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
25.48k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
13.2k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
12.8k (x1.1)
TOTAL
67.53k
93.12k (x1.38)

Multithread

i5-10200H

i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
276.56k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
251.6k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
104.55k (x3.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
10.58k (x2.49)
TOTAL
260.38k
643.29k (x2.47)

Performance/W
i5-10200H
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
2188 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
5594 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
8859 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5422 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
2808 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
2724 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
19813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4