| | | | | | |

Core i5-10200H vs i7-1185G7


Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-H
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
230.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
24.35k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
20.07k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
8.61k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
7.84k (x0.67)
TOTAL
67.53k
60.87k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-10200H

i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
93.58k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
94.71k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
33.28k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
9.34k (x2.2)
TOTAL
260.38k
230.91k (x0.89)

Performance/W
i5-10200H
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
8247 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4