| | | |

Core i3-550 vs Xeon E5504


Description
The i3-550 is based on Westmere architecture while the E5504 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-550 gets a score of 41.5 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.

Summarizing, the E5504 is 1 times faster than the i3-550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
20655
106a5
Core
Clarkdale
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /4
TDP
73 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2010
March 2009

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-550
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
7919
4574 (-42.24%)
Test#2 (FP)
5373
3069 (-42.88%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3181
1851 (-41.79%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2720
1426 (-47.59%)
TOTAL
19192
10920 (-43.10%)

Multithread

i3-550

E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
17202
19066 (10.83%)
Test#2 (FP)
12718
12521 (-1.55%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8714
7972 (-8.51%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2861
2391 (-16.45%)
TOTAL
41495
41950 (1.10%)

Performance/W
i3-550
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
236 points/W
238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
174 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
119 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
568 points/W
524 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-550
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
2475 points/GHz
2287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1679 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
850 points/GHz
713 points/GHz
TOTAL
5998 points/GHz
5460 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8