Core i3-550 vs Core 2 Duo E7200
Description
The i3-550 is based on Westmere architecture while the E7200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-550 gets a score of 38.8 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-550 is 1.5 times faster than the E7200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-550 gets a score of 38.8 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-550 is 1.5 times faster than the E7200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
10676
Core
Clarkdale
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.533 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
73 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
3072 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2010
April 2008
Mean monothread perf.
18.69k points
13.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.8k points
25.21k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-550
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
7.83k
2.93k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
5.3k
6.48k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.14k
2.6k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
1.45k (x0.6)
TOTAL
18.69k
13.46k (x0.72)
Multithread
i3-550
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
16.25k
5.85k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
12.12k
12.91k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.01k
5.22k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
1.23k (x0.51)
TOTAL
38.8k
25.21k (x0.65)
Performance/W
i3-550
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
223 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
199 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
110 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
531 points/W
388 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-550
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
2446 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1655 points/GHz
2558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
759 points/GHz
574 points/GHz
TOTAL
5842 points/GHz
5315 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4