Core i3-550 vs Celeron N5095
Description
The i3-550 is based on Westmere architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-550 gets a score of 38.8 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 2.4 times faster than the i3-550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-550 gets a score of 38.8 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 2.4 times faster than the i3-550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
906c0
Core
Clarkdale
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
73 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
kB
Cache L2
256 kB
kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2010
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
18.69k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.8k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-550
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
7.83k
10.08k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
5.3k
10.11k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.14k
4.06k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
2.36k (x0.97)
TOTAL
18.69k
26.6k (x1.42)
Multithread
i3-550
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
16.25k
36.86k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
12.12k
38.51k (x3.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.01k
15.17k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
2.72k (x1.13)
TOTAL
38.8k
93.26k (x2.4)
Performance/W
i3-550
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
223 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
110 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
531 points/W
6217 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-550
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
2446 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1655 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
759 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
5842 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4