Core i3-550 vs Celeron J1900
Description
The i3-550 is based on Westmere architecture while the J1900 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-550 gets a score of 38.8 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-550 is 1.2 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-550 gets a score of 38.8 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-550 is 1.2 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
30679
Core
Clarkdale
Bay Trail-D
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.42 GHz
Socket
LGA 1156
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
73 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
May 2010
November 2013
Mean monothread perf.
18.69k points
9.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.8k points
33.25k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-550
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
7.83k
4.58k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
5.3k
2.32k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.14k
1.72k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
1.14k (x0.47)
TOTAL
18.69k
9.75k (x0.52)
Multithread
i3-550
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
16.25k
17.16k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
12.12k
8.42k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.01k
6.22k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.42k
1.44k (x0.6)
TOTAL
38.8k
33.25k (x0.86)
Performance/W
i3-550
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
223 points/W
1716 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
842 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
110 points/W
622 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
531 points/W
3325 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-550
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
2446 points/GHz
1893 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1655 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
759 points/GHz
470 points/GHz
TOTAL
5842 points/GHz
4029 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4