Core i3-9100T vs Xeon X5670
Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 145.4 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.3 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 145.4 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.3 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
206c2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
6 /6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2019
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
13.74k
8.35k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
5.58k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
3.32k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.61k
3k (x0.35)
TOTAL
46.91k
20.26k (x0.43)
Multithread
i3-9100T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
50.5k
49.72k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
72.58k
35.19k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.09k
21.88k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
8.6k (x2.01)
TOTAL
145.45k
115.4k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i3-9100T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
1443 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2074 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
517 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
122 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
4156 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3713 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5325 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2327 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
12678 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4