Core i3-9100T vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
406f1
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2019
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
237.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
2.6k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
7.55k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
2.61k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
2.03k (x0.26)
TOTAL
31.81k
14.79k (x0.47)
Multithread
i3-9100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
17.41k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
57.83k
75.46k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
26.25k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.35k
4.65k (x1.07)
TOTAL
93.18k
123.78k (x1.33)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.74k
8.22k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
12.06k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
4.01k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.61k
2.89k (x0.34)
TOTAL
46.91k
27.18k (x0.58)
Multithread
i3-9100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
50.5k
61.34k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
72.58k
90.21k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.09k
26.2k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
4.62k (x1.08)
TOTAL
145.45k
182.37k (x1.25)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
6.04k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
10.18k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
2.74k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
2.41k (x0.27)
TOTAL
47.74k
21.37k (x0.45)
Multithread
i3-9100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
47.51k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
75.12k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
19.72k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
5.45k (x1.32)
TOTAL
147.95k
147.8k (x1)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
12.16k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
11.82k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
3.02k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
2.4k (x0.28)
TOTAL
60.16k
29.39k (x0.49)
Multithread
i3-9100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
103.77k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
102.28k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
26.13k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
5.65k (x1.33)
TOTAL
192.88k
237.83k (x1.23)
Performance/W
i3-9100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4