| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs Pentium G4560


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 145.4 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.6 times faster than the G4560. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
906e9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
44.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
89.91k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100T
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
13.74k
13.01k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
18.74k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
5.06k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.61k
7.4k (x0.86)
TOTAL
46.91k
44.21k (x0.94)

Multithread

i3-9100T

G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
50.5k
27.22k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
72.58k
43.79k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.09k
11.74k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
7.16k (x1.67)
TOTAL
145.45k
89.91k (x0.62)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
1443 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2074 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
517 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
122 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
4156 points/W
1665 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
3713 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5325 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2327 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
12678 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4