Core i3-9100T vs Pentium G3260
Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 145.4 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 2.5 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 145.4 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 2.5 times faster than the G3260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
306c3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2019
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
58.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-9100T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
13.74k
11.73k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
19.7k
10.45k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.86k
4.55k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.61k
3.83k (x0.44)
TOTAL
46.91k
30.56k (x0.65)
Multithread
i3-9100T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
50.5k
22.99k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
72.58k
20.53k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.09k
8.82k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.28k
6.55k (x1.53)
TOTAL
145.45k
58.89k (x0.4)
Performance/W
i3-9100T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
1443 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2074 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
517 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
122 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
4156 points/W
1111 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
3713 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5325 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2327 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
12678 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4