| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs i7-4930K


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-4930K is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 147.9 k points while the i7-4930K gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4930K is 1.3 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
306e4
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
32.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
198.27k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
12k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
11.35k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
4.53k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
4.35k (x0.49)
TOTAL
47.74k
32.22k (x0.67)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
72.46k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
80.33k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
33.44k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
12.03k (x2.92)
TOTAL
147.95k
198.27k (x1.34)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
1434 points/W
557 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2171 points/W
618 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
505 points/W
257 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
4227 points/W
1525 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
3676 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5562 points/GHz
2910 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2378 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
TOTAL
12902 points/GHz
8262 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4