| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs i7-4702MQ


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
306c3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /8
TDP
35 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2019
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
145.15k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100T
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
3.45k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
8.53k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
3.99k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
3.51k (x0.45)
TOTAL
31.81k
19.47k (x0.61)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
11.93k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
57.83k
42.4k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
18k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.35k
3.6k (x0.83)
TOTAL
93.18k
75.92k (x0.81)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
18.98k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
9.5k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
4.32k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
3.99k (x0.46)
TOTAL
60.16k
36.8k (x0.61)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
74.75k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
47.72k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
19.65k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
3.02k (x0.71)
TOTAL
192.88k
145.15k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
2020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
5932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
11499 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4