| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs i7-3770


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-3770 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 147.9 k points while the i7-3770 gets 133.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.1 times faster than the i7-3770 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
306a9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x62+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2019
April 2012
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
34.59k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
133.7k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-9100T
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
12.55k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.58k
12.11k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
4.69k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.8k
5.25k (x0.6)
TOTAL
47.74k
34.59k (x0.72)

Multithread

i3-9100T

i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
50.18k
49.56k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
75.99k
56.21k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.66k
22.17k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
5.75k (x1.39)
TOTAL
147.95k
133.7k (x0.9)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
1434 points/W
644 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2171 points/W
730 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
505 points/W
288 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
4227 points/W
1736 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
3676 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5562 points/GHz
3104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1286 points/GHz
1202 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2378 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
TOTAL
12902 points/GHz
8870 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4